Playing ‘Wifey’ With No Ring

Playing ‘Wifey’ With No Ring

It is acceptable for girlfriends to want to help take care of their boyfriends and vice versa, but there should be a line drawn. I tend to look at it like this; why would I want make my boyfriend my husband, when he performs all the husband duties as a boyfriend. That saves time (the wedding) and energy (if we were to get a divorce and have all the legal issues). I’m pretty sure guys think this too. I see females that give up all the goods, even every trick they have tucked away in the book to their boyfriends. Can you at least get engaged first? And the girlfriends that wait on their boyfriend hand and foot like he is the king. Now when you get married that is perfectly fine because he should be looked at as the king of the house. I have never had a problem with girlfriends cook for their guys because I’ve done it on plenty occasions, but when you’re the only one doing the cooking and he expects it every time he sees you, that’s a problem. Why give him everything when you guys aren’t officially each other’s everything. Yes, you guys may have plans to be each other’s everything, but who is to say those plans will be followed through with. I remember me thinking that I was doing too much when I sat there and washed my boyfriend at the time, dirty underwear. Sometimes you have to wake up and realize that you aren’t his wife yet, so why step into that role before your time. I’m not saying to sit on your ass and do nothing, especially when he is helping you as well. I’m just saying that you should save some for when you two are married. Why give him all the perks and services now? What will you have left? There will be nothing to look forward too. And as I said before, you have to think; why would I put a ring on it if I’m getting everything now without the ‘forever-type commitment’.